Why have a purse hide the entire front 1911? With what I can see...this is sort of a yeah, no. I cant see enough to decide if I would like it or not.
I do like
1903. Not much of a surprise since I like vintage and it's a good era since the 40s suit me.
I also like
1902. Again, vintage, and I like the style of these types of blouses. They are easy to wear and look nice.
Both have problems so it's not like I am going to run out and grab these unless I can find them on sale for around $3-4. Nothing I'd pay near full price like you have to.
Now for
1912. I like this, it suits my outdoor weekend lifestyle. The top would be great for late fall and early winter. There is something off about this though, and not sure I want to pay a higher price to go an ruin it by hiking.
@Renegade Sewist I'll mention those jeans. They say " front and back seaming for a perfect fit"...but those are anything BUT. Dude is shaped funny, and if he isn't then the pants make him look weird. They miss basic details that make jeans, jeans. They made a slack jean style, yet added work wear details (in the wrong spot? Very least they didn't bring it around to the front), details you normally see on women's jeans circa 1990s, the knee point they drafted is too high on him, and then made the break hit in a spot that isn't the more aesthetically pleasing for this particular model.
My dad was built like this man: short legs, very slim hips, square body shape. These are not this model's jean. The look both too big and too small and don't fit as if they were drafted for his body type.